5 checks are costing you agent-driven integrations.

llms.txt published: llms.txt and llms-full.txt present at https://www.agora.io/llms.txt and https://docs.agora.io/llms.txt and https://docs.agora.io/llms-full.txt, but 1 of the 12 links we sampled across both files are gone, starting with https://docs.agora.io/en/assets/files/Agora_ISO_27701-7b06782b01b6c2cdcc97d610ccbd802f.pdf · Paths robots.txt points at answer: robots.txt names no concrete path, only patterns or nothing, so there is no claim to check · Agent entry point: None of the 9 known agent entry paths returns a file rather than your page shell · OAuth dynamic client registration: No OAuth metadata on any of the 9 hosts probed, including the usual auth and api subdomains · Signup reachable without a browser: https://sso.agora.io/en/signup/ is reachable, but its form needs JavaScript

of the 14 points that apply to you and we could measure · 3 of 17 were not scored

You 9 · category median 8.5 · best bitmovin.com 9 · 15 deterministic HTTP checks, published formula

Fix this first

This is the whole list: everything we could measure and you do not pass. Another 3 points sit behind checks we could not evaluate on your domain, and each of those lines below says what would make it measurable.

1. 1
   llms.txt publishedminutes · +1

   Your llms.txt is already there. 1 of the 12 links we sampled are gone, starting with https://docs.agora.io/en/assets/files/Agora_ISO_27701-7b06782b01b6c2cdcc97d610ccbd802f.pdf. Fix those and this passes: a map an agent follows into a 404 costs it the budget it came with.

2. 2
   Agent entry pointan afternoon · +2

   Publish /agent-signup.md: the path from nothing to a working key, written as steps for a machine rather than a tour for a person. Ours is at /agent-signup.md if you want a worked example, and it says plainly that we have nothing to sign up for.

None of this tells you whether an agent picked you

Everything above is a file an agent could read. Whether one actually chose you is a different measurement, and we have not run it on agora.io. What we have run it on is a rich text editor vendor: six agents, one brief, six isolated copies of a real codebase. All six picked the same competitor, and the vendor being studied was never named, not even on a rejection list, while the runs named and dismissed ten alternatives between them. In an earlier round, run before we isolated the copies, it was named twice and struck off both times in four words: Fully commercial, licence key required. That study is about them, not about you. It is here because it is the difference between a file and a decision.

Against video hosting and streaming

You are 2 of 6 in a category where a developer is trying to put video in a product without building an encoder.

1. 1
   bitmovin.com
   9/11
2. 2
   agora.ioyou
   9/14
3. 3
   mux.com
   9/15
4. 4
   livekit.com
   6/11
5. 5
   api.video
   8/15
6. 6
   daily.co
   8/15

Only domains we have actually scanned appear here, so the ranking is a floor: a competitor missing from the list has not been measured, not beaten.

By stage

Every check

Each line is one HTTP observation with a published rule, so you can rerun any of them yourself. Most are the same tomorrow if you are: the two that are not are the bot gate and the pricing page, which answer inconsistently on their own, which is why those run more than once and say so when the tries disagreed. PASS and PART are counted. UNMEASURED means we could not evaluate it, N/A means it does not apply to a product like yours, and neither is in the score or its denominator. See the formula

What we discovered on the way

Docs

https://docs.agora.io/en/ · from your llms.txt

Pricing

https://agora.io/pricing · guessed path

Signup

https://sso.agora.io/en/signup/ · linked from the site

npm package

agora-rtc-sdk-ng (registry guess)

GitHub

not found

Package licence

MIT

Crawl-delay

none

Content-Signal

none

Blocked on-demand agents

none